« For days you're too lazy to blog... | Main | Business models I can't figure out.... »
March 31, 2003
Buchanan, Dowd, John Paul II, Natalie Maines....
I give the Bush administration credit for their spinning skills. The tone of the coverage has suggested American support for the Iraq invasion, but Pat Buchanan and Maureen Dowd are both against it (and, thank you Michael Moore, the Pope and the Dixie Chicks, as well). I think there's a tendency to conjoin support for the troops with support for the administration, which is just silly.
I have tremendous faith in the military's capabilities to achieve a clearly stated administration objective. I have zero faith in the current administration's ability to choose between peaceful and military alternatives and clearly state an objective.
If it turns out that the military was overruled on the necessary forces to get the administration's job done, we need regime change at home. Nineteen months and counting....
Also:
15 Stories They've Already Bungled
Greg Mitchell of Editor and Publisher (one of the leading magazines for journalists) critiques the fog of war passing for reporting, and notes that 14 times out of 15 so far, the stories have been reported in a way that favors the US/UK/Aussie invasion.
March 31, 2003 in Seen browsing | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bf6df53ef00d83458c28769e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Buchanan, Dowd, John Paul II, Natalie Maines....:
Comments
Welcome back.
Lots of questions on this overseas adventure, the largest of them being "why?"
Why haven't we seen Saddam Hussein since the start of this?
Why haven't we seen/found any of the dread WMDs this whole exercise is predicated on?
Why are armchair generals making tactical decisions that risk the lives of soldiers in the field?
Posted by: paul at Apr 3, 2003 2:02:49 AM