« Record industry financials | Main | Frank succumbs »
December 16, 2002
Wired for Dummies to debut
Boston Globe Online / Business / Magazine aims to be everyday guide to high-tech life
''Wired's become ultra-boring,'' said Stewart Alsop, a venture capitalist with New Enterprise Associates who sits on DigiT's advisory board. ''Everyone else is going out of business or playing it safe, so there's probably room in the tech publishing industry.''
Davis says he wants to use celebrity features to help DigiT do what Maxim did for the then-sedate men's magazine niche. Though it features an interview with the pianist Herbie Hancock about his use of technology, the first issue is heavy on product reviews and techno-speak, but Davis says the magazine has stories in the works on ways such stars as Sarah Jessica Parker use high-tech devices.
This strikes me as exactly what Wired has become -- they did a story on smart homes that was just glowing about the star of TV's "JAG".
The story suggests that "DigiT" will eschew the digerati for the hoi polloi, which leaves the question, "Where is the tech magazine for the digerati?"
With the death of Byte and the rise of dozens of specialist magazines on specific languages and products, the MIT Technology Review is about it...
December 16, 2002 in Seen browsing | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bf6df53ef00d834234feb53ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Wired for Dummies to debut:
Comments
Don't remind me about Byte, it was the best! Sigh...
The MIT Tech Review is good. I haven't read Science News in ages, but it was an excellent weekly on, uh, science news. It's nothing at all like Wired, though.
I spent much of my youth reading an older brother's Popular Science and Cycle magazines. Between that and my repeated exposure to Dad's stunning DIY skills, is it any wonder I got into technology?
Posted by: john at Dec 17, 2002 11:21:36 PM
The question I hear you asking is: where's the advertising supported tech magazine that's beefy enough to appeal to me as an alpha geek but mainstream enough to be around awhile?
I'm not sure those are compatible objectives. Maybe that's a website that needs to happen. Slashdot sans
Posted by: paul at Dec 21, 2002 1:03:15 AM
that's "Slashdot sans snarkiness"
Posted by: paul at Dec 21, 2002 1:04:48 AM